The social fallout from reducing property tax concessions

The social fallout from reducing property tax concessions

24 June 2016 by Michael Davoren 2 comments

I’d like to start an apolitical discussion on a political topic: negative gearing.

Will tampering with negative gearing affect the real estate industry? Yes, massively. But my comment is on how it will affect Australia as a social issue.

Shelter is a basic human need, like air, food and water.

Australians need shelter – an ongoing, sustainable supply of decent, habitable shelter.

A great percentage of those providing shelter for everyday Australians are ‘everyday’ landlords and property investors, not just the already-wealthy making money through rentals and growing portfolios.

What is their main reason for investing? They receive a tax incentive. A lot of investors provide shelter because of tax incentives.

Take the incentives away and the investor will follow. Their motivation will disappear and the basic need of every Australian, especially Australians who need to rent, will be shaken to its core. It will affect people from all walks of life, and from all financial levels.

There’s no talk of government stepping up to meet rental demand. I have heard no government, no party, no politician and no public servant address who is going to fill the gap, or make any mention of government-assisted housing.

Changing the negative gearing formula will not be of any benefit to Australians. It will not work to any benefit, just as it has not in the past when tampering has happened.

The real estate industry is united in its stand. I add my concern for the almost one third of Australians who rent. Where will they turn when the supply of rental properties dries up?

[Related: Agents must take a position on negative gearing]

Michael Davoren has been in real estate for around four decades and held senior management positions and directorships with major real estate groups in Australia and New Zealand. Michael has also held leadership positions in the industry, having been president of both the Real Estate Institute of Queensland and the Real Estate Institute of Australia. He was an executive board member of the Chicago-based International Consortium of Real Estate Associations for five years.

Michael is an Australian Property Finance (APF) director, a New Zealand Property Finance (NZPF) director and a director of SQUIIZ.com.au.

He co-owns RE/MAX Australia and RE/MAX New Zealand.

More articles from this author:
promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
reb top 100 agents 2016

With a combined sales volume of $13 billion in 2016, the Top 100 Agents ranking represents the very best sales agents in Australia. Find out what sets them apart and learn their secrets to success.

featured podcast

featured podcast
William Phillips on how agents can expand their database and grow their business

In this episode of Secrets of the Top 100 Agents, host Tim Neary is joined again by William Phillips to discuss the real estate database and...

View all podcasts

Are dodgy agents being punished enough?

Yes (8.6%)
No (55%)
Only in some states (2.3%)
Not all dodgy agents are being found out (34.1%)

Total votes: 220
The voting for this poll has ended on: April 15, 2017
upcoming events
REB Awards
Sydney The Event Centre 12 Sep
REB Awards
Sydney The Event Centre 12 Sep
Melbourne The Event Centre 14 Oct
Brisbane The Event Centre 18 Dec
View all events
Do you have an industry update?