Ensure you never miss an issue of the
real estate business bulletin
Vendors reveal biggest agent failures

Vendors reveal biggest agent failures

by Kylie Davis 2 comments

One of the biggest points of contention between property vendors and real estate agents is price expectations, and how they are determined.

From the real estate agents’ side, the stereotype goes that every vendor thinks their home is worth more than it is. Agents are therefore set up to fail when they cannot achieve – quickly – a sale that is 20 per cent over the median in a market that is 30 per cent worse than the last price peak.

From the vendors’ side, agents are overpaid smooth talkers who will tell you anything to get you to sign, and then spend the entire campaign trying to talk you down to get you to accept an insulting offer. Pricing, in the view of vendors, is a dark art that most agents practise poorly.

No wonder real estate agents rate so poorly in consumer trust surveys (such as Roy Morgan’s Image of Professions Survey), when the core of this push and pull is not a debate over the facts, but an argument over opinions and trust.

But the recent Consumer Perceptions of Real Estate survey by CoreLogic – the first survey in Australia to specifically examine the satisfaction levels of vendors in their engagement with agents – shed some light on how conversations about price and the old stereotypes can change.

The survey of more than 300 vendors who had used an agent (most within the past two years) found that the majority of vendors (74 per cent) actually achieved the price they expected – or higher.

The survey further identified that the agents with the strongest communication, negotiation and customer service skills were most likely to be rated ‘excellent’ by their vendors and receive glowing testimonials.

One of the most interesting findings was the level of vendor satisfaction achieved by agents who demonstrated best-practice use of key data and market insights.

Put simply, the agents that took the time and trouble to explain their market to vendors using data – not opinion – were significantly more likely to be rated excellent than those that did not.

At the other end of the spectrum, the agents who sought to keep their vendors in the dark, showing them as little data as possible, were most likely to receive a ‘poor’ or ‘unsatisfactory’ rating.

The survey revealed five key findings:

• 79 per cent of agents showed their vendors recent sales in their area, but only 54 per cent showed their vendors recent sales of properties similar to the one they were selling.

• Only 51 per cent of agents showed their vendors recent sales that their own office had made.

• Only 28 per cent of agents showed their vendors data that explained what the current time on market was in their area.

• Only 55 per cent of agents presented suburb information such as median prices and price growth to their vendors.

• Only 11 per cent of agents talked to their vendors about auction clearance rates in their suburb (although about 30 per cent of vendors chose this method of sale).

This insight has sparked rigorous debates with some agents, who tell me vendors can’t be trusted to understand property data correctly and that providing information around price just misleads them.

Here’s the thing: the internet has made this argument completely void. Vendors – and buyers – have access to property data now, whether or not their agents approve.

Rather than stopping your vendors and buyers seeing data, your efforts will be best spent in directing and guiding their interpretation of it.

The comments from the survey highlighted that this is exactly how the best agents do it. They know their clients have access to information, so they work with it.

Best-practice agents get ahead of the data curve by sharing with their vendors links to websites that they believe offer trustworthy data insights. They show their vendors easy-to-understand charts and graphs that help them create realistic expectations of price.

Top-rated agents walk their vendors through the data that they used, to show them how they came to the price they did. And if the data changes – through changing market conditions – they give them a fact-based update with revised recent sale insights. They don’t just have a chat. Trust is not achieved by asking for it, but by demonstrating trustworthy behaviour.

Vendors reveal biggest agent failures
lawyersweekly logo

Kylie Davis is the head of marketing for property services at CoreLogic. She joined CoreLogic after nearly four years as network editor of real estate at News Corp Australia, creating a national desk of real estate reporters across more than 100 titles, and training them in the use of data and market journalism. She has a 25-year career in media across News and Fairfax Media, and as a 20-something was the founder and publisher of hyper-local newspaper The Village Voice. Follow her on Twitter: @KDavisCoreLogic

More articles from this author:
Recommended by Spike Native Network
reb top 100 agents 2017

The REB Top 100 Agents ranking is the foremost ranking of agents in Australia. It has set the bar for excellence in Australian real estate. To be ranked as an REB Top 100 Agent is the standard real estate professionals strive for. See the full 2018 ranking here!

featured podcast

featured podcast
Turning a shy personality into a confident agent

McGrath Epping’s Betty Ockerlander is number 15 in this year’s REB Top 100 Agents ranking, a position earned through her dedication to ...

View all podcasts

What keeps you awake at night?

The threat from the so-called digital disruptors like the property portals, DIY models and lead generating platforms
Competition from other agents in my local catchment area
Changes in the traditional real estate model and an uncertain future for the industry
The current cooling markets and other economic influencers
Nothing. I back myself to meet the challenges ahead
Do you have an industry update?