Ensure you never miss an issue of the
real estate business bulletin
Big Data can help you find high-commission, low-competition suburbs

Big Data can help you find high-commission, low-competition suburbs

by Greg Dickason 0 comments
Greg Dickason

In my last Big Data article, I wrote about how it has the potential to disrupt the real estate industry.

I concluded that Big Data will disrupt agencies and its agents – the winners will be those who adopt and embrace distribution, while those that don’t will wither.

Adopters become more efficient, are better connected to their customers and can spend more time on their selling craft. Big Data won’t eliminate the business of an agency and agent; rather, it will eventually damage those that don’t use the tools available.

Let me explain by looking at houses across New South Wales as an example.

From our agency and sales databases, I extracted the approximate spread of commissions earned per suburb for the year to October 2014. I plotted these against the competitiveness of each suburb, judged by the number of agencies active in that suburb in September 2014. The purpose was to illustrate how just a little data and some CoreLogic RPData tools can highlight where to fish for more business – in this case, where the competition is low and the available commission is high. I further filtered by suburbs with more than 200 sales in the year and divided into property type (houses and units).

Three suburbs stood out:

  1. Suburb 1 had only 10 active agencies, with each agency earning an average of $2.6 million in commission in the year. There were 340 house sales for those 10 agencies to compete for.
  2. Suburb 2 had 26 active agencies, which earned an average commission of just over $500,000. Those agencies competed for 553 house sales.
  3. Suburb 3 was somewhere in the middle, with 15 active agencies, an average commission of more than $850,000 and 293 house sales.

Where, then, would you fish? I know where I would – where the commission is high and the number of competing agencies low!

The analysis shows that some suburbs are more competitive than others. In some, your agency would be one of many and you would have to fight for your brand to cut through; in others, you would be one of a few and you could more easily differentiate yourself.

Looking at Victorian houses produced an even more interesting result. One suburb had eight active agencies, which earned an average commission of more than $2.6 million. Those agencies competed for 421 house sales, making that suburb a great place to fish.

In other states there were similar trends, showing how a little filtering can help define where to chase.

Similar analysis can be done at the agency or agent level to find the best suburb, or even which suburb in each geographic territory to focus on.

A little bit of data used well can make a big difference to your earning potential.

And what are the suburbs behind the numbers above? I suggest you do some analysis and find out!

Big Data can help you find high-commission, low-competition suburbs
lawyersweekly logo
promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
reb top 100 agents 2017

The REB Top 100 Agents ranking is the foremost ranking of agents in Australia. It has set the bar for excellence in Australian real estate. To be ranked as an REB Top 100 Agent is the standard real estate professionals strive for. See the full 2018 ranking here!

featured podcast

featured podcast
An industry where the resilient succeeds

Tim Heavyside believes that a strong support team and good foundations are paramount to success in the real estate industry, and with regu...

View all podcasts

Would you consider working for Purplebricks or a similar 'DIY' model?

Yes (7.2%)
No (80.9%)
Perhaps - make me an offer (12%)

Total votes: 209
The voting for this poll has ended on: July 13, 2018
Do you have an industry update?