Industry body backs investors on affordability debate

Industry body backs investors on affordability debate

20 May 2016 by Staff Reporter 0 comments

A second property organisation has come to the defence of investors in the wake of the industry’s debate on housing affordability, and has outlined two strategies to tackle the issue.

The Property Council of Australia said in a statement that while some have argued that investors are driving up house prices, the statistics prove otherwise.

“The fact is that owner-occupiers account for two in every three purchases,” it said. “Far from crowding out home buyers – investors are supporting supply. In 2015, investors supplied 58,000 new dwellings nationwide.”

According to the Property Council, one of the reasons the industry opposes changes to negative gearing is because it believes it will impact housing supply.

“You can’t put $32 billion in new taxes on the property industry and not expect it to harm housing supply and make a bad situation worse,” it said.

“No modelling has been produced on the [Labor Party’s] proposed changes to negative gearing. No one can be certain about its impact on investment, construction, prices and rents.”

The industry body said there are two areas where the federal and state governments can work together to improve housing affordability.

“First, we should re-establish ‘national competition payments’ and incentivise the states and local government to reform outdated planning laws,” it said.

“While we have seen piecemeal improvements from state governments in recent years, our planning systems are stymieing growth and putting artificial pressures on house prices.

“Research undertaken by Deloitte indicates that national competition payments could provide up to $3 billion in economic uplift,” the statement said.

Secondly, the Property Council said the debate on stamp duty needs to be kick-started.

“Stamp duty is a dreadfully inefficient tax that is a drag on the economy and kicks every house buyer in the shins,” it said.

“Stamp duty has become a woeful crutch for state government budgets. In Sydney, the typical householder pays $35,000 in stamp duty, in Melbourne it's $32,000 and in Perth $16,000.

“Worse still, when home owners put the cost of stamp duty onto their mortgage, over the life of a loan they are paying the tax all over again.”

The Property Council’s comments come after Heath Bedford of Performance Property Advisory said investors have been unfairly caught in the crossfire amid the examination of the current affordability crisis.

[Related: Real estate CEO sounds alarm on industry-wide threat]

promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Listen to other installment of the Real Estate Business Podcast
reb top 100 agents 2016

With a combined sales volume of $13 billion in 2016, the Top 100 Agents ranking represents the very best sales agents in Australia. Find out what sets them apart and learn their secrets to success.

featured podcast

featured podcast
William Phillips on how agents can expand their database and grow their business

Get up close and personal with the best real estate sales agents in Australia in Secrets of the Top 100 Agents. ...

View all podcasts

Are dodgy agents being punished enough?

Yes (8.6%)
No (55%)
Only in some states (2.3%)
Not all dodgy agents are being found out (34.1%)

Total votes: 220
The voting for this poll has ended on: April 15, 2017
upcoming events
REB Awards
Sydney The Event Centre 12 Sep
REB Awards
Sydney The Event Centre 12 Sep
Melbourne The Event Centre 14 Oct
Brisbane The Event Centre 18 Dec
View all events
Do you have an industry update?