Ensure you never miss an issue of the
real estate business bulletin
Removal of consent of the tenant clause ‘absurd’

Removal of consent of the tenant clause ‘absurd’

by Andrew Jennings 4 comments

Changes to legislation in relation to showing prospective tenants through a property when a tenant wishes to break their lease have been called “absurd” by the Real Estate Institute of South Australia (REISA).

The REISA has said the number one issue it is receiving at the moment is the situation of showing tenants through a property when a tenant wishes to break their lease, adding that the removal of the 'consent of the tenant’ clause has thrown the situation into disarray.

“Prior to the change in the law in March there was a blanket clause that included a rights of entry for the landlord, or agent, with the consent of the tenant,” a REISA spokesperson told Residential Property Manager.

“So if a landlord knocked on a tenant’s door, and the tenant said ‘yes, come on in’, it was absolutely fine. That consent to the tenant clause was removed from the new legislation, which now says you have to do specific things for rights of entry.”

The REISA said the most practical solution is that a tenant should inform a landlord in writing that they will be vacating the property before the end of the lease. 

According to the REISA, the landlord or agent should respond by a letter of acknowledgement that confirms the vacate date, the fact the tenant will be liable for break lease costs (if that is what is sought by the landlord) and that the landlord/agent will be showing prospective tenants through the property in the 28 days before that vacate date.

"Technically speaking, if somebody wanted to break their lease today and their lease expired at the end of the year, you could not really start showing tenants through until end of the year. How absurd is that? It has to change," the REISA spokesperson said.

The REISA said the only legal solution at the moment is for the landlord and tenant to vary the lease to make a new end date. However, it added this has issues relating to break lease costs - is the tenant responsible as they have not abandoned the property? - and the situation when the property manager still has not found a tenant by the agreed new date.

Removal of consent of the tenant clause ‘absurd’
lawyersweekly logo
promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Listen to other installment of the Real Estate Business Podcast
reb top 100 agents 2017

The REB Top 100 Agents ranking is the foremost ranking of agents in Australia. It has set the bar for excellence in Australian real estate. To be ranked as an REB Top 100 Agent is the standard real estate professionals strive for. See the full 2018 ranking here!

featured podcast

featured podcast
The difference between an average agent and one who dominates

McGrath Crows Nest’s Peter Chauncy is number 10 in this year’s REB Top 100 Agents ranking. Peter, however, is more likely not surprised ...

View all podcasts

Would you consider working for Purplebricks or a similar 'DIY' model?

Yes (7.2%)
No (80.9%)
Perhaps - make me an offer (12%)

Total votes: 209
The voting for this poll has ended on: July 13, 2018
Do you have an industry update?