Ensure you never miss an issue of the
real estate business bulletin
Time’s up for negative gearing?

Time’s up for negative gearing?

by James Mitchell, John Bastick 1 comments

A leading economist has called on the federal government to end negative gearing to limit the potential damage of a dangerously overheated investor market.

The Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s chief economist, Saul Eslake, said the controversial property tax should be “grandfathered” – continued for those who currently use it and banned here on in for everybody else.

Neither was Mr Eslake a fan of the RBA’s mooted changes to lending laws – where investor borrowing limits would be curbed – saying they wouldn’t work or, worse, would hurt those who are not the source of the problem.

He said ending tax concessions through negative gearing going forward was the “simple answer” without impacting those who already use it.

“If you grandfather it so that you’re not taking it away from the 15 per cent of the electorate who has it, then my view is: what’s the problem?” he said.

Mr Eslake agreed that the biggest hurdle to eliminating negative gearing was convincing politicians they wouldn’t be walloped at the ballot box by furious investors.

“If the government or the opposition were to present it properly, nor should there be a political backlash because they are not taking a privilege away from anyone who is currently enjoying it,” he said.

However, senior economist at the Domain Group, Dr Andrew Wilson, believes negative gearing is so entrenched, and that the pros so outweigh the cons, that it’s here to stay.

Dr Wilson believes investors build the dwellings governments used to and “as investors, there are no guarantees that you’ll get your tenant, you’ll get your yield, you’ll get your cash flow, or your capital growth” and they should be duly compensated for that with tax concessions.

“If there’s no incentive the property market would be dead,” Dr Wilson told Residential Property Manager's sister title, The Adviser. “Investors would take their money to equity markets or gold or stamp collecting.

“The argument against negative gearing is nonsense; sure they might tinker with (the laws) at the edges, but it’s here to stay,” he said.

Time’s up for negative gearing?
lawyersweekly logo
promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Listen to other installment of the Real Estate Business Podcast
reb top 100 agents 2017

The REB Top 100 Agents ranking is the foremost ranking of agents in Australia. It has set the bar for excellence in Australian real estate. To be ranked as an REB Top 100 Agent is the standard real estate professionals strive for. See the full 2018 ranking here!

featured podcast

featured podcast
The difference between an average agent and one who dominates

McGrath Crows Nest’s Peter Chauncy is number 10 in this year’s REB Top 100 Agents ranking. Peter, however, is more likely not surprised ...

View all podcasts

Would you consider working for Purplebricks or a similar 'DIY' model?

Yes (7.2%)
No (80.9%)
Perhaps - make me an offer (12%)

Total votes: 209
The voting for this poll has ended on: July 13, 2018
Do you have an industry update?