Ensure you never miss an issue of the
real estate business bulletin
PM wins legal victory over disgruntled residents

PM wins legal victory over disgruntled residents

by Nick Bendel 0 comments

A legal tribunal has found in favour of a property management company and overturned a ruling that it compensate two former tenants.

The Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal overruled a decision from August 2014 that ruled against KTK Property Management and in favour of tenants Victor Ho and Blythe Ho.

The tribunal also dismissed the awarding of $3,000 compensation to Mr and Mrs Ho.

The dispute was triggered in 2013 when the place being rented by the Hos suffered termite damage. The termites were removed but damage to a window sill wasn’t repaired, according to the tribunal.

“In April 2014, KTK issued a notice to remedy breach to remove an illegal structure that Mr and Mrs Ho had built in the courtyard,” the tribunal said.

“In May 2014, Mr and Mrs Ho filed a dispute resolution request with the Residential Tenancies Authority.

“In late May 2014, they filed a claim for compensation for the loss of enjoyment caused by the [termite] damage. Two JPs ordered KTK pay Mr and Mrs Ho $3,000 compensation.”

KTK appealed to the tribunal, in part because it claimed the tenants did not file their claim within six months of the breach of tenancy agreement, as required by the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008.

The tribunal agreed that the claim had been filed too late and therefore should never have been heard.

The original finding also wrongly accepted that Mr and Mrs Ho had suffered a “substantial decrease in the amenity of the property” due to the termite damage, according to the tribunal.

The tribunal said the odour from the termite bait was not strong enough to affect the tenants or make them alter their living arrangements, as they had argued.

It was also noted that Mr and Mrs Ho renewed their tenancy agreement in March 2014 and accepted a rental increase of $10 per week.

“KTK offered them a six-month tenancy agreement but Mr and Mrs Ho asked for a 12-month tenancy agreement,” the tribunal said.

“These are not the actions of tenants who consider there has been a substantial diminution in the amenity of the property.”

[Related: Illegal agent fined over incorrect trust accounting]

 

PM wins legal victory over disgruntled residents
lawyersweekly logo
promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Listen to other installment of the Real Estate Business Podcast
reb top 100 agents 2017

The REB Top 100 Agents ranking is the foremost ranking of agents in Australia. It has set the bar for excellence in Australian real estate. To be ranked as an REB Top 100 Agent is the standard real estate professionals strive for. See the full 2018 ranking here!

featured podcast

featured podcast
The difference between an average agent and one who dominates

McGrath Crows Nest’s Peter Chauncy is number 10 in this year’s REB Top 100 Agents ranking. Peter, however, is more likely not surprised ...

View all podcasts

Would you consider working for Purplebricks or a similar 'DIY' model?

Yes (7.2%)
No (80.9%)
Perhaps - make me an offer (12%)

Total votes: 209
The voting for this poll has ended on: July 13, 2018
Do you have an industry update?