Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
realestatebusiness logo
Subscribe to our newsletter SIGN UP

Scrapping negative gearing would save $2.9bn: Greens

09 June 2015 Nick Bendel

One of Australia’s political parties has finally committed itself to pushing for an end to negative gearing

The Greens have proposed to remove negative gearing for new investment properties and to invest the savings in social and public housing instead.

This policy would only apply to properties purchased after 1 July 2015 – properties bought before that date would be unaffected by the new rules.

According to the Greens, the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) estimates the policy would save almost $2.9 billion out to 2017-2018.

The Greens would use that revenue to directly fund construction of 7,000 new homes for the homeless and 7,500 new social housing dwellings.

Deputy leader Scott Ludlam said negative gearing is “fundamentally unfair” because it forces low- and middle-income Australians to subsidise richer property investors.

“It is time to call an end to this skewed concession that has contributed to the housing bubble and provides a tax benefit 10 times greater for the highest income earners than for the lowest,” Senator Ludlam said.

The Greens have also asked the PBO to examine capital gains tax concessions, which Mr Ludlam said are “overwhelmingly subsidised by low- and middle-income taxpayers”.

Negative gearing has been in the news a lot in the past few months as the property boom in Sydney and Melbourne has made housing affordability a significant political issue.

Treasurer Joe Hockey has ruled out abolishing negative gearing – shadow treasurer Chris Bowen has said it is highly unlikely that any party would entirely scrap the policy, but that Labor might propose some amendments at the next election.

The Australian Council of Social Service released a report in April that claimed negative gearing worsens housing affordability.

However, this was contradicted by the Housing Industry Association, which claims that removing negative gearing would reduce affordability and lower living standards.

[Related: Scrapping negative gearing not on political agenda]

 

Scrapping negative gearing would save $2.9bn: Greens
lawyersweekly logo
FROM THE WEB
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Listen to other installment of the Real Estate Business Podcast

What is the worst mistake vendors make?

Price too high
Taking low offers too personally
Neglecting curb appeal
Not ‘staging’ the home for sale
Do you have an industry update?
REAL ESTATE BUSINESS NEWSLETTER
Ensure you never miss an issue of the Real Estate Business Bulletin. Enter your email to receive the latest real estate advice and tools to help you sell.