Property developer wins $121,000 in court battle

Property developer wins $121,000 in court battle

by 0 comments

A Brisbane-based property developer has been awarded $121,000 after it was found that the Sydney-based financial planner he was working with did not hold a Queensland real estate license.

Property developer Cellcom used the expertise of the financial planner Sultana Investments to market units located in the Sunshine state to its clients.

According to The Australian Financial Review, Cellcom agreed to pay Sultana a $10,000 commission for ‘each unit sold’, with $5,000 payable after a sale went unconditional and another $5,000 payable on settlement.

Cellcom paid $10,000 for each of the 14 properties that were sold. However, when a further eight units went to the unconditional stage only, the property developer refused to pay the $5,000 part payment.

Sultana Investments took Cellcom to court for the $77,000 owing. After originally winning, Cellcom appealed under the proviso that Sultana Investments were not licensed estate agents in Queensland.

The appeal was successful and Sultana Investments was forced to pay $121,000.

A Brisbane-based property developer has been awarded $121,000 after it was found that the Sydney-based financial planner he was working with did not hold a Queensland real estate license.

Property developer Cellcom used the expertise of the financial planner Sultana Investments to market units located in the Sunshine state to its clients.

According to The Australian Financial Review, Cellcom agreed to pay Sultana a $10,000 commission for ‘each unit sold’, with $5,000 payable after a sale went unconditional and another $5,000 payable on settlement.

Cellcom paid $10,000 for each of the 14 properties that were sold. However, when a further eight units went to the unconditional stage only, the property developer refused to pay the $5,000 part payment.

Sultana Investments took Cellcom to court for the $77,000 owing. After originally winning, Cellcom appealed under the proviso that Sultana Investments were not licensed estate agents in Queensland.

The appeal was successful and Sultana Investments was forced to pay $121,000.

promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Listen to other installment of the Real Estate Business Podcast
reb top 100 agents 2016

With a combined sales volume of $13 billion in 2016, the Top 100 Agents ranking represents the very best sales agents in Australia. Find out what sets them apart and learn their secrets to success.

featured podcast

featured podcast
How this agent's commitment to clientele built him a 25k-strong client base

In this episode of Secrets of the Top 100 Agents, host Tim Nearly talks to RT Edgar’s Glen Coutinho who ranked number six in this year’...

View all podcasts

How effective are testimonials as a marketing tool?

Not effective at all
Somewhat effective
Very effective
They are the most effective tool there is
Do you have an industry update?