Agents bearing brunt of marketing costs

Agents bearing brunt of marketing costs

13 September 2011 by Staff Reporter 2 comments

Matthew Sullivan

More than 67 per cent of real estate agents do not pass on the additional costs of marketing a property to the vendor and instead cover the costs with their commission, new research has found.

In a recent Real Estate Business straw poll, 23.6 per cent of the 937 respondents said they charged vendors an additional fee for the marketing of their property.

Just over eight per cent claimed that they recouped some of the additional marketing costs.

Agents shouldn’t shy away from charging vendors an additional fee for the marketing a property given the time and resources required to successfully market a home, LJ Hooker Wembley principal Peter Locke said.

“The seller has a right to say what they wish for and how they will like their home to be marketed, therefore agents have the right to charge vendors with the associated costs of doing so,” the Perth-based principal told Real Estate Business.

“Generally, the more marketing a home receives the higher number of people in competition for the property. With the average days on market up and around 125, marketing is a crucial part of selling a home in timely fashion.”

These comments were largely echoed by Brenton Gadsby, sales executive for Bradfield & Prichard in Double Bay, NSW.

Speaking to Real Estate Business, Mr Gadsby, whose agency is based in Sydney's high-end eastern suburbs, said he was surprised to hear that such a large portion of the industry did not charge vendors additional marketing fees.

“In our office we have a saying, ‘you’re either on the market or in the background’. Most vendors understand advertising costs are simply part of the package,” he said.

“Marketing a property is about achieving the highest possible sales price for the vendor, so it surprises me that more agents are not passing on the cost.”

Matthew Sullivan

More than 67 per cent of real estate agents do not pass on the additional costs of marketing a property to the vendor and instead cover the costs with their commission, new research has found.

In a recent Real Estate Business straw poll, 23.6 per cent of the 937 respondents said they charged vendors an additional fee for the marketing of their property.

Just over eight per cent claimed that they recouped some of the additional marketing costs.

Agents shouldn’t shy away from charging vendors an additional fee for the marketing a property given the time and resources required to successfully market a home, LJ Hooker Wembley principal Peter Locke said.

“The seller has a right to say what they wish for and how they will like their home to be marketed, therefore agents have the right to charge vendors with the associated costs of doing so,” the Perth-based principal told Real Estate Business.

“Generally, the more marketing a home receives the higher number of people in competition for the property. With the average days on market up and around 125, marketing is a crucial part of selling a home in timely fashion.”

These comments were largely echoed by Brenton Gadsby, sales executive for Bradfield & Prichard in Double Bay, NSW.

Speaking to Real Estate Business, Mr Gadsby, whose agency is based in Sydney's high-end eastern suburbs, said he was surprised to hear that such a large portion of the industry did not charge vendors additional marketing fees.

“In our office we have a saying, ‘you’re either on the market or in the background’. Most vendors understand advertising costs are simply part of the package,” he said.

“Marketing a property is about achieving the highest possible sales price for the vendor, so it surprises me that more agents are not passing on the cost.”

promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Listen to other installment of the Real Estate Business Podcast
reb top 100 agents 2016

With a combined sales volume of $13 billion in 2016, the Top 100 Agents ranking represents the very best sales agents in Australia. Find out what sets them apart and learn their secrets to success.

featured podcast

featured podcast
REVEALED: The 10 best agents in Australia for 2017

For the first time ever, the top 10 agents in the REB Top 100 Agents ranking are revealed in this exclusive podcast. ...

View all podcasts

Are dodgy agents being punished enough?

Yes (8.6%)
No (55%)
Only in some states (2.3%)
Not all dodgy agents are being found out (34.1%)

Total votes: 220
The voting for this poll has ended on: April 15, 2017
Do you have an industry update?