Ensure you never miss an issue of the
real estate business bulletin
Agents bearing brunt of marketing costs

Agents bearing brunt of marketing costs

by Reporter 2 comments

Matthew Sullivan

More than 67 per cent of real estate agents do not pass on the additional costs of marketing a property to the vendor and instead cover the costs with their commission, new research has found.

In a recent Real Estate Business straw poll, 23.6 per cent of the 937 respondents said they charged vendors an additional fee for the marketing of their property.

Just over eight per cent claimed that they recouped some of the additional marketing costs.

Agents shouldn’t shy away from charging vendors an additional fee for the marketing a property given the time and resources required to successfully market a home, LJ Hooker Wembley principal Peter Locke said.

“The seller has a right to say what they wish for and how they will like their home to be marketed, therefore agents have the right to charge vendors with the associated costs of doing so,” the Perth-based principal told Real Estate Business.

“Generally, the more marketing a home receives the higher number of people in competition for the property. With the average days on market up and around 125, marketing is a crucial part of selling a home in timely fashion.”

These comments were largely echoed by Brenton Gadsby, sales executive for Bradfield & Prichard in Double Bay, NSW.

Speaking to Real Estate Business, Mr Gadsby, whose agency is based in Sydney's high-end eastern suburbs, said he was surprised to hear that such a large portion of the industry did not charge vendors additional marketing fees.

“In our office we have a saying, ‘you’re either on the market or in the background’. Most vendors understand advertising costs are simply part of the package,” he said.

“Marketing a property is about achieving the highest possible sales price for the vendor, so it surprises me that more agents are not passing on the cost.”

le>.b-autolinks{text-decoration:underline}.b-autolinkshadowbox { display: inline; position: relative; cursor: pointer; color: #428bca;} .b-autolinkshadowbox:hover > span { display: block !important; } .b-autolinkshadowbox__links { white-space: nowrap; z-index: 999; display: none; left: 0; border: 1px solid #bfbfbf; border-radius: 5px; font-size: 12px; top: 12px;color: #000; padding: 10px; position: absolute; background-color: #FFF; box-shadow: 0px 0px 20px 1px #bfbfbf; } .b-autolinkshadowbox__links > a { display: block; padding: 3px 0; }
Agents bearing brunt of marketing costs
lawyersweekly logo
promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Listen to other installment of the Real Estate Business Podcast
reb top 100 agents 2017

The REB Top 100 Agents ranking is the foremost ranking of agents in Australia. It has set the bar for excellence in Australian real estate. To be ranked as an REB Top 100 Agent is the standard real estate professionals strive for. See the full 2018 ranking here!

featured podcast

featured podcast
The difference between an average agent and one who dominates

McGrath Crows Nest’s Peter Chauncy is number 10 in this year’s REB Top 100 Agents ranking. Peter, however, is more likely not surprised ...

View all podcasts

Would you consider working for Purplebricks or a similar 'DIY' model?

Yes (7.2%)
No (80.9%)
Perhaps - make me an offer (12%)

Total votes: 209
The voting for this poll has ended on: July 13, 2018
Do you have an industry update?