New stamp duty payment methods needed

New stamp duty payment methods needed

13 October 2011 by Staff Reporter 0 comments

Simon Parker

With state governments unlikely to remove property stamp duties, the head of RE/MAX in Western Australia said it’s time to consider new ways of helping home owners pay the tax.

“The simple solution is to allow homebuyers to spread the payment of stamp duty over 10 years and in so doing maintain the income for the states while minimizing the extra barrier to home purchase or repurchase,” said RE/MAX WA regional owner, Geoff Baldwin.

“If a home owner were to sell before the stamp duty is repaid the outstanding balance would simply be due and payable at sale or settlement of the property.”

“To assist in the successful and financially viable introduction of this new system it would probably have to happen over several years with a reducing lump sum to be paid upon purchase and the rest over time.

Mr Baldwin said while he was opposed to the tax, state governments had become accustomed to receiving the millions of dollars of revenue generated from stamp duty for many decades, and as such were unlikely to have it removed.

His call for change comes hot on the heels of the federal government’s Tax Forum, which sparked fresh requests for the removal of stamp duty taxes.

“State governments have an obligation to ensure the ongoing viability of all industries and any measures taken to assist home purchase would provide a much needed boost to the established and new home sectors which are both massive employers," Mr Baldwin said.

Simon Parker

With state governments unlikely to remove property stamp duties, the head of RE/MAX in Western Australia said it’s time to consider new ways of helping home owners pay the tax.

“The simple solution is to allow homebuyers to spread the payment of stamp duty over 10 years and in so doing maintain the income for the states while minimizing the extra barrier to home purchase or repurchase,” said RE/MAX WA regional owner, Geoff Baldwin.

“If a home owner were to sell before the stamp duty is repaid the outstanding balance would simply be due and payable at sale or settlement of the property.”

“To assist in the successful and financially viable introduction of this new system it would probably have to happen over several years with a reducing lump sum to be paid upon purchase and the rest over time.

Mr Baldwin said while he was opposed to the tax, state governments had become accustomed to receiving the millions of dollars of revenue generated from stamp duty for many decades, and as such were unlikely to have it removed.

His call for change comes hot on the heels of the federal government’s Tax Forum, which sparked fresh requests for the removal of stamp duty taxes.

“State governments have an obligation to ensure the ongoing viability of all industries and any measures taken to assist home purchase would provide a much needed boost to the established and new home sectors which are both massive employers," Mr Baldwin said.

promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Listen to other installment of the Real Estate Business Podcast
reb top 100 agents 2016

With a combined sales volume of $13 billion in 2016, the Top 100 Agents ranking represents the very best sales agents in Australia. Find out what sets them apart and learn their secrets to success.

featured podcast

featured podcast
REVEALED: The 10 best agents in Australia for 2017

For the first time ever, the top 10 agents in the REB Top 100 Agents ranking are revealed in this exclusive podcast. ...

View all podcasts

Are dodgy agents being punished enough?

Yes (8.6%)
No (55%)
Only in some states (2.3%)
Not all dodgy agents are being found out (34.1%)

Total votes: 220
The voting for this poll has ended on: April 15, 2017
Do you have an industry update?