Unlicensed agents fined for rent-to-buy scheme

Unlicensed agents fined for rent-to-buy scheme

07 March 2014 by Steven Cross 1 comments

Two unlicensed agents have been fined almost $30,000 by the Supreme Court after their rent-to-buy scheme was foiled by Consumer Protection.

The Western Australian scheme was conducted by Patricia and Bryan Susilo, who on 27 February 2014 admitted to their misleading and deceptive conduct.

Ms Susilo further admitted to operating as a real estate agent without a licence.

Between late 2010 and early 2013, Consumer Protection alleged that deceptive statements from the company were used to lure unwary investors.

Such statements included: “Own my home”, which gives the impression the prospective buyer in these schemes would get either sole or joint ownership of the homes after signing the contract, which was not the case; “No banks needed” and “Stuff the banks – move in today”, which Consumer Protection claimed suggests buyers could purchase the home without a bank loan, when the promoters had no reasonable grounds to make these statements; “We do not charge commission or fees”, which was misleading since the promoters derived revenue from the arrangement; and “We are part of a group of real estate investors”, which was false.

In addition, figures related to the weekly cost to prospective buyers did not accurately reflect the true total cost required to eventually own the property.

Commissioner for Consumer Protection Anne Driscoll said this case highlighted the dangers of people getting involved in these complex arrangements.

“It would appear from our investigations into these rent-to-buy property schemes that the prospective buyers are at great risk of losing their money and sellers are locked into a fixed sale price for the duration of the contract,” Ms Driscoll said.

“The schemes target people who are desperate and find it difficult to get finance to purchase a home, as well as vendors who are having difficulty selling their homes.

“Those who may be contemplating taking part in these schemes should think very carefully and get expert financial and legal advice before signing any contracts. They should treat any claims being made by promoters with scepticism and check to make sure information being provided by the promoter is accurate.”

Ms Driscoll warned other promoters of these types of schemes currently operating without a licence that they too could face prosecution and similar penalties.

promoted content
Recommended by Spike Native Network
Listen to other installment of the Real Estate Business Podcast
reb top 100 agents 2016

With a combined sales volume of $13 billion in 2016, the Top 100 Agents ranking represents the very best sales agents in Australia. Find out what sets them apart and learn their secrets to success.

featured podcast

featured podcast
William Phillips on how agents can expand their database and grow their business

Get up close and personal with the best real estate sales agents in Australia in Secrets of the Top 100 Agents. ...

View all podcasts

Are dodgy agents being punished enough?

Yes (8.6%)
No (55%)
Only in some states (2.3%)
Not all dodgy agents are being found out (34.1%)

Total votes: 220
The voting for this poll has ended on: April 15, 2017
upcoming events
REB Awards
Sydney The Event Centre 12 Sep
REB Awards
Sydney The Event Centre 12 Sep
Melbourne The Event Centre 14 Oct
Brisbane The Event Centre 18 Dec
View all events
Do you have an industry update?