OPINION: The property management industry has inherited its pricing model from real estate sales – a percentage of the transaction value – and hardly anyone has stopped to ask whether that inheritance actually makes sense for a service that has nothing to do with transactions.
Percentage-based fees work when you are selling a house because the commission scales with the outcome, and the agent’s job ends at settlement. But property management is not just a single transaction. It is an ongoing professional service relationship that can last a decade or more, and the cost of delivering that service barely correlates with the rent the property generates.
A $400-a-week property can demand more compliance work, more maintenance coordination, and more tenant management than one renting for $1,000 a week. But under a percentage model, the lower-rent property generates less revenue despite consuming equal or greater resources. The logic is inverted: the harder a property manager works, the less they earn relative to the workload. No other profession structures its fees this way.
When I go to a surgeon, I do not negotiate a percentage of the outcome – I pay for the diagnosis and the treatment, whether the problem is minor or life-threatening, because the fee reflects the expertise being applied, not the asset being protected. That is how professional services pricing works. The fee is for the service, not a share of what the client owns. And property management is a professional service, which is why the agencies I have seen break out of the percentage trap all share one structural decision: they move to a flat fee.
Tara Bradbury, principal of Active Agents in Hervey Bay, made the call before opening her doors. Every landlord would pay the same fee regardless of whether their property rented for $400 or $1,000 a week. She has completed two rounds of fee increases since – each presented alongside evidence of value delivered – and her rent roll has grown past 400 properties. The flat fee works because it is grounded in something defensible: the actual cost and value of the service, not a percentage that can be chipped away over the first coffee meeting.
This is where the flat fee has a second advantage that is rarely discussed and arguably more important than the revenue stability: it is harder to negotiate. When I sell a property and the agent says 2.2 per cent, the first thing I do is counter with 1.7 per cent, and I will keep pushing because the percentage is framed as a share of my outcome rather than a payment for a defined service. A flat fee removes that dynamic entirely. It sits on the table as a fixed amount for a defined scope of work, and there is nothing to negotiate because the cost of delivering the service simply does not change based on which property you own. I have watched property managers sit in front of owners and watch their fee get chipped away because the conversation started from a percentage that felt negotiable. The flat fee changes the conversation entirely.
None of this is easy, and I think the industry’s reluctance to move away from percentages is rooted in something real: flat fees require confidence in the value you deliver. If a property manager cannot articulate what their service is worth in dollar terms and they have never done the exercise of calculating what it actually costs to manage a property and what the owner receives in return, they will default to a percentage because it is the path of least resistance. For agencies that serve properties across very different rental values, the flat fee also means some owners pay more relative to their rent than others. That takes conviction to maintain.
But here is what I have learned from the agencies that have made the switch: the owners who push back on a flat fee are usually the ones who are price-sensitive on everything, while the ones who see the value do not question it. And those are the relationships that last, because the conversation was about value from the beginning instead of about discounting. The industry is going to move in this direction eventually. A percentage model that scales with rent without any relationship to the work required is structurally irrational. The question is not whether flat fees will become more common – it is which agencies will make the shift on their own terms and which will wait until the market forces them.
If I were starting a property management business today, I would not open the doors with a percentage-based fee. I would set a flat fee that reflected the actual value of the service, and I would defend it with data rather than discounting. That is how a professional prices their work, and the industry needs more of this.
Alex Whitlock is the director of REB and co-founder of Managed.
Managed was built to help next-generation agencies win market share fast. It is the only comprehensive property management platform that exclusively delivers secure, instant, and automated direct payments from tenant to landlord, eradicating the need for a trust account.
If you’d like to find out how Managed can help power your growth, call Conor on 0452 298 394 or book a discovery call today.