Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
realestatebusiness logo
Home of the REB Top 100 Agents

Housing affordability – there’s no silver bullet

By
10 May 2016 | 11 minute read
joewalton250x250 may2017

Housing affordability has been a key focus of federal and state governments in the lead-up to this year’s budget, particularly given the strength of the Sydney and Melbourne markets. However, strong house price growth is not the only factor affecting Millennials trying to get a foothold on the property ladder.

Many of these complex factors have little to do with property – stagnant wage growth and the increasingly high cost of tertiary education.

Melbourne’s property market is performing strongly, with house prices heading in an upward trajectory since 2013. In the past decade, the metropolitan Melbourne median house price rose from $386,000 in March 2007 to $826,000 in March this year – a $440,000 or 114 per cent increase. While this seems extraordinary, Melbourne’s median house price has fallen short of doubling in the past seven years, which is the typical cyclical growth rate for property.

==
==

The main driver of house price increases in Melbourne has been high population growth. Interstate migration is at its highest level in more than four decades. Around 107,000 new residents call Melbourne home every year. Melbourne is Australia’s fastest growing city and demand for housing continues to outstrip supply, which is resulting in increased competition for homes within the city limits.

The state government’s response has been to increase taxes on those who can afford property. At present, stamp duty on property transactions in Victoria is the single biggest source of revenue in the state, forecast to contribute $6.2 billion in 2017-18. Land tax will generate a further $2.4 billion for the government’s coffers. Other property taxes introduced under the current state government – including absentee owner tax, vacant residential property tax and additional stamp duty for foreign purchasers - will also contribute to the state’s revenue.

These taxes, and the federal government’s capital gains tax, have not reduced the cost of housing. In fact, they have achieved the opposite by making it unattractive for property owners to buy and sell without significant expense. Given the level of revenue both levels of government pocket from the property industry, it can afford to do more for first home buyers. The first home owners grant should be available on both new and established houses, and the recent doubling of the FHOG in regional Victoria should also be provided to buyers in Melbourne.

Wage growth has also failed to keep pace with the increased cost of living and is at its lowest level in 10 years – at 1.9 per cent in Victoria. While that rate fell to 2.6 per cent in 2015, annual wage growth is generally around 3-3.5 per cent.

Millennials are also one of the first generations of buyers to be saddled with high levels of student debt. And the federal budget confirms that the cost of a tertiary education is only going to get more expensive, with student fees rising 7.5 per cent by 2021. The repayment threshold is also decreasing by $13,000, making it even harder for our nation’s young people to save for a deposit.

Given that Australia’s property market is the largest store of personal wealth, it is imperative that new generations of buyers have access to the market. There’s no silver bullet to improving housing affordability, but further taxing the property industry and punishing investors is not the solution.

Do you have an industry update?
Subscribe
Subscribe to REB logo Newsletter

Ensure you never miss an issue of the Real Estate Business Bulletin.
Enter your email to receive the latest real estate advice and tools to help you sell.