Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
realestatebusiness logo
Home of the REB Top 100 Agents

Investor demand, owner-occupier refinancing stalls in April

By cameron-kusher
14 June 2017 | 12 minute read
cameron kusher 850

The latest ABS housing data shows that lending to owner-occupiers is fairly flat and demand from the investor segment, along with refinancing, has continued to stall, writes CoreLogic’s Cameron Kusher.

The April 2017 housing finance data shows that over April there was $32.5 billion worth of commitments, -1.6 per cent lower than the $33.0 billion in commitments in March. Relative to April 2016, the value of housing finance commitments was 3.6 per cent higher in April this year.

Over the month of April 2017, there was $19.9 billion worth of housing finance commitments to owner-occupiers, the lowest value of lending to owner-occupiers since November 2016.

There was a further $12.6 billion in finance commitments to investors which was the lowest value of lending to this cohort since September 2016. Remember that the cooling of investor lending has largely occurred before the recent changes to investor lending policies came into effect.

Investors have been feeling the impact of greater interest rates increases than those implemented for owner-occupiers.

The $19.9 billion in owner-occupier housing finance commitments in April 2017 consisted of $1.9 billion for the construction of dwellings, $1.1 billion for purchase of new dwellings, $5.8 billion for refinancing of established dwellings and $11.1 billion for purchase of established dwellings.

The value of housing finance commitments for refinancing of established dwellings is now, -20.9 per cent lower than it was at its December 2015 peak.

Investors committed to $12.6 billion in housing finance commitments over the month consisting of $1.1 billion for the construction of dwellings and $11.4 billion for established housing. Investor housing demand is slowing, due to a pull-back in demand for established investment properties.

==
==

Looking at lending across the states and territories, the thing that is immediately noticeable is how overweight investment lending is in New South Wales (with 45.5 per cent of investors, compared to owner-occupiers for new loans at 37.1 per cent and owner-occupiers for refinances at 17.1 per cent), and to a lesser degree in Victoria (with 38 per cent of investors, compared to owner-occupiers for new loans at 43.3 per cent and owner-occupiers for refinances at 18.1 per cent).

In fact, New South Wales is the only state in which new lending to owner-occupiers is lower in value than lending to investors. The state level data is not seasonally adjusted and given the large volume of public holidays in April the data is generally weaker than data from March.

Nevertheless, when we look at the proportion of lending, it shows that there is some emerging weakness in investor lending.

If you strip out refinancing to focus on only new lending, the majority of new lending in New South Wales is to investors, while in most other states and territories, investors are less than 40 per cent of new lending. 

Compared to recent levels, the proportion of lending has slowed in New South Wales, falling from 57.6 per cent in January 2017 to 55.3 per cent currently. It has also fallen in Victoria from 47.6 per cent of all new lending in September 2016 to 46.8 per cent currently.

The pull-back in lending to investors in the two most populous states, which also have the hottest housing markets, would be encouraging for banking regulators. Of course, both of these states are still seeing investor participation which is well above long-term average levels and a further pull-back, which is anticipated, could slow the rate of value appreciation in Sydney and Melbourne.

Overall, the data points to further weakness in housing finance demand from investors and from owner-occupiers that are refinancing. The investors slowdown is likely due largely so far to the higher interest rates being pushed to customers, and with a crackdown on new interest-only lending yet to come into effect, it is reasonable to expect further weakness in investor demand over the coming months.

In terms of refinance, this is potentially slowing because some of the lending policy changes are making it more difficult for people to refinance, particularly if it is with the intention to then take out an investor loan.

If, as expected, the weakness in housing finance demand continues, it is likely to lead to a slowdown in housing demand. As a result, this would likely lead to slower levels of value growth over the coming months, particularly once the tougher lending rules come into effect for interest-only lending.

This is even before considering the potential for additional costs due to the banking levy and the recent credit downgrading of the non-major banks which are likely in some form to be passed on to mortgagees.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


cameron-kusher

cameron-kusher

Cameron Kusher is RP Data’s senior research analyst, specialising in primary and secondary data analysis, property market commentary and consultancy. Cameron has a thorough understanding of the fundamentals such as demographics, trends, economics and spacial analysis and is a regular keynote speaker for property-related groups, regulated industry bodies, corporations and the government sectors.

Do you have an industry update?
Subscribe
Subscribe to REB logo Newsletter

Ensure you never miss an issue of the Real Estate Business Bulletin.
Enter your email to receive the latest real estate advice and tools to help you sell.