Login
iscover
In a submission to the Andrews government, Victoria’s peak real estate body has urged the government to consider shifting from the “tired tax” to a broad-based tax.
Responding to Victoria’s Parliamentary Inquiry into Land Transfer Duty Fees, the Real Estate Institute of Victoria (REIV) believes a broad-based tax would avoid the inefficient and disproportionate effects of house price bracket creep while enabling greater housing efficiency.
“The REIV has long sought an abolishment of this tired tax,” REIV’s chief executive officer, Quentin Kilian, said, adding that stamp duty “has created an excessive burden on home buyers for far too long, with fees for the median priced house currently sitting at approximately 48.9 per cent of a Victorian’s average annual income.”
He reaffirmed the Institute’s belief that a “broad-based tax system will be beneficial for the economy and housing market in Victoria.”
The Institute noted that the transition would provide the government with a stabler and more predictable revenue stream, even as stamp duty revenue rose 61.3 per cent between the 2020–21 and 2021–22 financial years.
Mr Killian described the nature of land transfer tax as “dependent on market activity and performance,” something which he noted “impacts government revenue predictability,” especially when considering “the fluctuation in revenue points to the fact that when households are in need, government revenue is likely to also be impacted.”
He explained that this factor “makes meaningful policy intervention more difficult.”
In his eyes, removing stamp duty would incite greater market sustainability and spur market activity to the state’s economic benefit.
According to the REIV’s submission: “As stamp duty increases the cost of moving, people may choose to remain where they are rather than pursue job opportunities elsewhere — contributing to the lack of skilled labourers in areas of need, negatively affecting productivity.”
As he did in March when the review of stamp duty was announced, Mr Kilian once again called on the Andrews government to invite stakeholders and experts into the fold to contribute to a roadmap that both supports home ownership and maintains tax income.
“We look forward to further conversations with policymakers about how the government and sector can move forward together and create a better system for all Victorians,” he concluded.
Last year, NSW’s Perrottet government acted to remove the state’s stamp duty taxation scheme for first home buyers, opting to replace it with a land tax scheme offering a full stamp duty exemption on properties valued up to $650,000 or a concession on properties between $650,000 and $800,000. Relevant buyers would be able to opt into a smaller annual tax on any properties valued between $800,000 and $1.5 million.
As previously reported on REB, the scheme was welcomed by two-thirds of the state’s first home buyers, while research found 80 per cent of homes within the state would qualify for the scheme, if they were sold to FHBs.
Prior to winning last month’s election, NSW’s latest Premier, Chris Minns, announced a similar land tax scheme would remain under his party’s rule.
Newsletter
